Windmill.dev is not "fully open-sourced (AGPLv3)"

To evaluate the claim that Windmill.dev is not 'fully open-sourced (AGPLv3),' we need to examine its licensing against the core tenets of AGPLv3. The AGPLv3 is a strong copyleft license that requires full source code availability—including for modifications—especially when used as a network service (e.g., SaaS). For a project to be 'fully open-sourced' under AGPLv3, it must:

1. ·Provide complete source code access: The entire codebase must be publicly available.
2. ·License under AGPLv3 explicitly: Ensuring users can modify, distribute, and access derivative works.
3. ·Comply with network service clauses: Users interacting with the software over a network must receive the corresponding source code.

Potential reasons for Windmill.dev not meeting this standard could include:

• ·Proprietary components: Some modules or dependencies might use non-AGPLv3 licenses.
• ·Incomplete source disclosure: Critical parts of the code might not be shared.
• ·Non-compliance with AGPLv3 terms: Failures in providing modifications or network service source access.

To verify, I recommend:

1. ·Reviewing Windmill.dev's official repository (e.g., GitHub) for license files and full source availability.
2. ·Checking community discussions or issue trackers for licensing concerns.
3. ·Contacting the maintainers directly for clarification on compliance.

AGPLv3's strict network-use clause often leads projects to adopt dual-licensing or more permissive terms for commercial flexibility. If Windmill.dev diverges from full AGPLv3 compliance, it may reflect such strategic trade-offs.