DruxAI
← New search
🌐 Live WebBeta — synthesis improving

Which AI model excels at reasoning abilities?

3 modelsComplete
8 sources
70%Consensus Score3 models mostly agreed, with some nuance. Read the breakdown.
🔴Semantic Entropy — Fragmented · 2 distinct meanings across 3 responsesH=58%
70%
consensus
Mostly aligned
How much the models agreed on this answer

High agreement — the answer is well-supported across models.

Models agree on

  • GPT-5.6 Sol leads in reasoning benchmarks (score: 57.5)
  • Claude Mythos Preview (56.7) and Claude Opus 5 (56.1) are top alternatives
  • Reasoning models excel with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and self-correction
  • Specialized strengths: Gemini (multimodal), Grok (real-time), o3 (mathematical logic)

Points of disagreement

  • ~Phi-4 cites GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6 (vs. others referencing GPT-5.6/Claude 5)
  • ~Phi-4 omits Grok 4.3/DeeSeek V4-Pro, while others include them in rankings

As of August 2026, the AI model landscape for reasoning abilities is led by GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI), which outperforms competitors on standardized logical deduction benchmarks like GPQA Diamond and ARC-Challenge, with a top score of 57.5. It excels in structured, step-by-step reasoning, particularly when using its Think-High/Think-Max compute modes for complex problems. Claude Mythos Preview (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 5 are close contenders, scoring 56.7 and 56.1 respectively, with strengths in nuanced, creative reasoning and long-context tasks. Gemini 3.5 Pro/Flash (Google) leads in multimodal reasoning and large-context processing, while Grok 4.3 (xAI) focuses on real-time information with low hallucination.

Key reasoning traits across top models include:

  • ·Skills: Logical operations (e.g., deductive proofs, multi-step math).
  • ·Calibration: Confidence aligns with correctness for self-correction.
  • ·Strategy: Chain-of-thought planning.
  • ·Abstraction: Higher-level concept reuse.

For specialized use cases:

  • ·Mathematical/formal logic: OpenAI o3 (or GPT-5.6 Sol in Think modes).
  • ·Nuanced trade-off analysis: Claude Opus 4.6/5 or Mythos.
  • ·General multi-step reasoning: GPT-5.4/5.6 Sol.
  • ·Factual/current-knowledge tasks: Gemini 2.5/3.5 Pro.

Latency varies by mode (120–400 ms per 1k tokens), with higher accuracy requiring deeper compute (e.g., Think-Max). Open-source options like DeepSeek-V4-Pro offer competitive reasoning at lower cost, though they trail proprietary leaders.

Follow-ups

You just saw open-source models answer

Want GPT-5, Claude, Gemini & more on the same question?

Sign in free to run any question against frontier models — side by side, same synthesis, honest comparison.

GPT-5Claude SonnetGemini 2.5 ProGrokDeepSeek R1Perplexity Sonar
Free models only · sign in for premium